12 DailyPro - More Than Half a Million Gone For Receivership

Tags: , .

Hi there! If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed so you'll always get the latest from us. Should you have any questions, feel free to email Jude

An email update from the firm on the cost of 12 DailyPro placing under receivership.

NOTICE OF HEARING ON THIRD INTERIM FEE APPLICATIONS
OF RECEIVER AND HIS PROFESSIONALS

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 3, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Stephen G. Larson, in Courtroom No. 1 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division, located at 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, California 92501, Thomas F. Lennon (”Receiver”) will move the Court for an Order approving the third interim fee applications of the Receiver and his professionals, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP (”Allen Matkins”), counsel to the Receiver; and Investigative Technologies LLC (”IT”), information and technology consultant to the Receiver. Detailed fee applications are on file with the Court. If you were served only with a copy of this Notice of Hearing, you may obtain copies of the applications and supporting papers from the Clerk of the Court, or by requesting them in writing from counsel for the Receiver, or by accessing the Receiver’s website at www.tlennonfor12dailypro.com. The Receiver and his professionals request approval of the following fees and expenses:

12dailypro receivership fees

The Receiver and his professionals are requesting that an interim payment of 80% of the requested fees and 100% of the requested expenses be authorized on the current applications. The fees and expenses are requested pursuant to the order appointing the Receiver, which provides that the Receiver may employ professionals and that the Receiver’s expenses and those of his professionals are to be paid from the assets of the defendants upon application to the Court. The fees and expenses of the Receiver and his professionals are requested only on an interim basis; the final determination of the ultimate allowable amount of fees and expenses to be paid to the Receiver and his professionals will take place at a final fee application hearing at the end of the case.

Procedural Requirements. If you oppose the application, you should consult, among other authorities, the Local District Court Rules for the applicable procedural requirements. Your opposition papers must be filed with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division, 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, California 92501, and served on the undersigned not later than fourteen (14) days before the hearing.

Dated: January 25, 2008

Debra A. Riley, Esq.
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
501 West Broadway, 15th Floor
San Diego, California 92101-3541
Attorneys for Receiver Thomas F. Lennon

Err.. $733,510? Robbing the victims blind right before their eyes before they even get anything back!

So before you get anything back from any scams or any programs put under receivership, the main pie would be gone, leaving the bits and crumbs to many victims. The same for EmoCorp, I don’t see any difference here either.

If you like our articles, please consider signing up for our RSS!

Share This

RSS feed | Trackback URI

9 Comments »

Comment by fuzzcatski
2008-01-26 18:01:44

This is the third trip to the pot for these crooks….the actual count (including this latest travesty) is closer to $2 MILLION!
Your wonderful “government” at work - what they didn’t let StormPay Inc. get away with they are giving to the Receiver and their lawyers & data-miners…..

Deeper & deeper into the pit we sink while the elite get richer and more powerful. Revolution, anyone?

 
Comment by fuzzcatski
2008-01-26 18:05:27

Don’t get me wrong - they deserve pay for the work they do - but something commensurate with their efforts instead of this extremely inflated travesty!

Comment by Jude Subscribed to comments via email
2008-01-26 18:08:31

Whatever you say is sad, but true. At the rate that they’re sucking in, I don’t really think there’s anything left for affected members.

 
 
Comment by gaby Subscribed to comments via email
2008-01-26 19:37:39

.. maybe they will ask for some extra donations to cover expenses ;)

Comment by Jude Subscribed to comments via email
2008-01-29 19:29:26

cheques make payable to ‘Ben Shalom Bernanke’

 
 
Comment by Stijn Subscribed to comments via email
2008-01-27 13:11:17

This is so typical…. but I can’t say I didn’t expect it. In the end the members/investors will be wondering who the real crooks are in this case: the owner of the program or the lawyers and governments..??

Comment by Jude Subscribed to comments via email
2008-01-29 19:27:36

The lawyers and government would have probably made more than Charis Johnson herself.

 
 
Comment by BUzz Subscribed to comments via email
2008-01-28 22:42:21

These legal BASTARDS are the actual ones who are robbing us.

They are screwing us left, right, centre and behind.

And they are doing it in broad daylight.

SIGH……….

Wish I have them in front of me with my shot gun.

That will be their PAY DAY from yours truly.

LOL………..

SHAMELESS BASTARDS. THEY ARE ALL THIEVES ! ! !

Comment by Jude Subscribed to comments via email
2008-01-29 19:28:11

I share your sentiments. It’s really unfair :(

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong> in your comment.
Close
E-mail It