<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FireFox 2.0.0.12 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/</link>
	<description>An Investment Publication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas</title>
		<link>http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>Suggestion...

&lt;a href=&quot;https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/722&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NoScript&lt;/a&gt; is a valuable add-on to have. Can be a pain in the butt especially when you visit new site. On the flipside however, that very same pain could save you from even more pain from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mark.org.il/index.php/2008/02/09/path-traversal-via-dom-injection-vulnerability-in-firefox-20012/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;malicious code injections&lt;/a&gt; (if only I can even figure out myself what the heck that means).

Nic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suggestion&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/722" rel="nofollow">NoScript</a> is a valuable add-on to have. Can be a pain in the butt especially when you visit new site. On the flipside however, that very same pain could save you from even more pain from <a href="http://www.mark.org.il/index.php/2008/02/09/path-traversal-via-dom-injection-vulnerability-in-firefox-20012/" rel="nofollow">malicious code injections</a> (if only I can even figure out myself what the heck that means).</p>
<p>Nic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoseLeon</title>
		<link>http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>JoseLeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I only use safari in Mac, and firefox if I must use linux/bsd or windows.

Safari is great, you can make a private navigation or transform websites into pdf, etc... and if you need an image or an entire website you only need to drag and drop from the website into some folder or desktop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only use safari in Mac, and firefox if I must use linux/bsd or windows.</p>
<p>Safari is great, you can make a private navigation or transform websites into pdf, etc&#8230; and if you need an image or an entire website you only need to drag and drop from the website into some folder or desktop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I wonder too. Safari is based upon the Gecko mozilla engine from my understanding so there already is a link between the two pieces of software. But the question is why should someone who isn&#039;t familiar with Firefox even bother installing it on MacOS X if Safari does everything they need. It&#039;s that whole IE vs Netscape thing all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I wonder too. Safari is based upon the Gecko mozilla engine from my understanding so there already is a link between the two pieces of software. But the question is why should someone who isn&#8217;t familiar with Firefox even bother installing it on MacOS X if Safari does everything they need. It&#8217;s that whole IE vs Netscape thing all over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 14:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-534</guid>
		<description>Definitely. It rawks. Wonder apart from Safari, does Mac users use Firefox too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely. It rawks. Wonder apart from Safari, does Mac users use Firefox too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan</title>
		<link>http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobsinvest.com/firefox-20012-released/#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Two words: Firefox Rules!

The End.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words: Firefox Rules!</p>
<p>The End.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

